Menu
Trustero SOC 2 compliance software
Trustero markets itself as 'framework agnostic' and maps a shared control library across many regulations rather than building fully native, framework-specific control sets, so buyers with one narrow framework need should verify depth of coverage before buying.
By Peter Korpak, Lead Editor · independently researched · Methodology
- Pricing
- Quote-based (reported $5K–$25K/yr)
- Source-checked frameworks
- 7
- Integrations
- 200+
- G2 (2026-07-24)
- 4.9 · 29 reviews
We could not find a public pricing page on trustero.com itself; the only concrete prices are AWS Marketplace list prices, a narrower and more enterprise-oriented channel than most direct SOC 2 automation competitors that publish self-serve pricing. G2 shows a small review base (order of dozens of reviews) compared to market leaders, though ratings are high.
Raised a $10.35 million Series A round led by Bright Pixel Capital, with participation from existing investors Engineering Capital, Zetta Venture Partners, and Vertex Ventures US, announced November 21, 2024.
What Trustero does.
Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Yes | Vendor/marketplace description: AI reads and maps evidence (screenshots, spreadsheets, docs) to controls automatically. Source |
| Auditor workspace | Yes | AWS Marketplace listing describes a 'dedicated auditor dashboard for secure evidence review... real-time collaboration with internal and external auditors.' Source |
| Trust center | Yes | Trustero offers a 'Trust Portal' product (trust.trustero.com) for answering customer compliance questions. Source |
| Security questionnaire answering | Yes | Questionnaire Copilot answers inbound security questionnaires from policies/controls/evidence, vendor-claimed to cut completion time over 85%. Source |
| Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) | Not established | No SSO/SCIM/RBAC disclosure found on the public site or marketplace listing. |
| SCIM 2.0 provisioning | Not established | No pricing page, no SSO or SCIM mention on the product pages, and absent from both identity-provider directories we checked. No evidence either way. |
| Continuous control testing | Yes | Vendor markets 'Continuous Control Monitoring' with AI agents testing controls on a recurring basis (24/7 claim on homepage). Source |
| Native multi-framework support | Partial | Site states 'Each control is mapped to multiple applicable frameworks and regulations' -- suggesting a shared, cross-mapped control library rather than fully independent native control sets per framework. Source |
7 frameworks checked individually, and how well each is established.
A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.
| Framework | Evidence | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| SOC 1 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| ISO 27001 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| HIPAA | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| PCI DSS | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| NIST CSF | Inferred | Recorded by the vendor as "NIST"; read as NIST CSF. Source |
| CMMC | Vendor-claimed | Source |
Trustero uses quote-based pricing.
Getting a direct number requires a sales conversation. Anything below comes from reported quotes or marketplace listings, and is labeled as such.
- Disclosure model
- Quote-based (reported $5K–$25K/yr)
- Sourced annual range
- USD 5,000–25,000 / year
- Basis
- Confirmed, 2026-07-24
Software pricing alone does not establish the audit fee. A licensed CPA firm issues the SOC 2 report. A commercial offer may package coordination or the fee, so get the legal provider, deliverable, and amount in writing. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for scope and budget context.
Who actually issues the report.
Trustero is not a CPA firm and does not issue SOC 2 reports itself; it prepares evidence, controls, and audit-readiness materials that customers hand off to an independently engaged, AICPA-licensed audit firm. The product includes an 'Auditors' persona/dashboard for evidence review and collaboration, but no public list of partnered audit firms was found.
Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.
Who Trustero is for, and who it is not.
Good fit
A mid-market or enterprise compliance team managing multiple frameworks off one control library, or an MSSP that wants a white-labeled multi-client GRC layer, and is comfortable with a sales-assisted buying process rather than self-serve signup.
Poor fit
A very early-stage startup wanting a cheap, fully self-serve SOC 2 tool with public pricing on the vendor's own site should look elsewhere: trustero.com has no public pricing page and gates everything behind a demo request, and the only concrete prices we found (AWS Marketplace, from $5,000/year for the SMB platform plus a separate $15,000/year SOC 2 Type 2 framework add-on) sit above typical entry-level, self-serve competitors.
Typical buyer: Mid-market to enterprise GRC/compliance teams running one or several overlapping frameworks off a shared control library, or an MSSP wanting a white-labeled multi-client GRC layer..
Compare Trustero with three alternatives.
- Comp AI Sponsored
An engineering-led company that values an inspectable, self-hostable compliance platform and wants one vendor scope that can include guided implementation, a trust center, penetration testing, and audit coordination when quoted.
-
A company pursuing multiple related certifications (e.g. SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 or HITRUST) that wants one connected provider relationship instead of coordinating separate software and audit vendors. It also fits the opposite buyer: a team running Vanta, Drata or ServiceNow that wants an AI-assisted audit firm and does not want to move its GRC stack to get one.
-
A company fielding a high volume of inbound security questionnaires and enterprise trust reviews, where TrustShare's AI pre-fill and live trust portal reduce sales-cycle friction as much as the SOC 2 compliance work itself.
Where every figure on this page came from.
5 sources, each with what it establishes and when we read it. If a claim here is out of date, this is the list that tells you which one to re-check.
- Lists Trustero's platform tiers and per-framework add-on pricing ($5,000/$10,000 platform tiers, $15,000 SOC 2 Type 2 framework, 12-month contract) and an AI-generated capability summary (200+ integrations, audit dashboard, evidence mapping). https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-fycxdxxhez46q
- G2 shows Trustero rated 4.9/5 from 29 verified reviews (retrieved via search snippet; direct G2 page crawl was blocked by a DataDome captcha). https://www.g2.com/sellers/trustero
- Trustero closed a $10.35M Series A led by Bright Pixel Capital, announced November 21, 2024. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241121183096/en/Trustero-Secures-%2410M-Series-A-Funding-Led-by-Bright-Pixel-Capital-to-Revolutionize-AI-Driven-Security-and-Compliance
- Third-party review lists Trustero's G2 rating as 4.3/5 and frameworks as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR -- conflicts with the 4.9/29 figure shown on G2's own sellers page. https://www.auditxyz.com/tools/customer-trust/trustero
- Lists the frameworks Trustero markets support for, including SOC 1/2, ISO 27001/27701, NIST, CMMC, FedRAMP, SOX, PCI, DORA, GDPR, HITRUST, NYDFS, PIPEDA. https://trustero.com/products/frameworks
2 facts on this page we could not establish.
Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at Trustero, send us the sources and we will fill them.
Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where Trustero appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the ledger above alongside the date.