Menu
Zania SOC 2 compliance software
Zania spans first-party compliance, controls testing, internal risk, and third-party risk rather than behaving like a narrow first-SOC-2 checklist.
By Peter Korpak, Lead Editor · independently researched · Methodology
- Pricing
- Quote-based
- Source-checked frameworks
- 6
- Integrations
- The SOC 2 page says agents can collect beyond native integrations through browser automation, but it does not quantify the native catalog.
- G2 (2026-08-15)
- 5 · 1 reviews
Its public product material describes source-linked testing and remediation, but the native integration count, SCIM and multi-entity administration, implementation time, and exact SOC 2 auditor handoff remain unestablished. The public review footprint is also early: G2 showed one review when checked.
Founded in 2023 by Shruti Gupta. SecurityWeek reported an $18 million Series A led by NEA in September 2025.
What Zania does.
Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Yes | Zania says agents continuously gather, refresh, and map evidence from connected systems and can use browser automation with human oversight where native integrations do not exist. Source |
| Auditor workspace | Not established | The Enterprise plan includes unlimited reviewer seats and audit-ready reporting, and the SOC 2 page describes a shared view for audit stakeholders. No dedicated SOC 2 auditor portal, request workflow, or bring-your-own-auditor process is publicly documented. |
| Trust center | Not established | Zania operates its own SafeBase-hosted trust center, but that does not establish a trust-center product sold to customers. |
| Security questionnaire answering | Yes | Zania documents an inbound workflow that generates draft responses from previous answers and internal documentation, maps supporting evidence, flags stale material, and leaves final approval with the security team. Source |
| Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) | Partial | Zania documents SSO through SAML for Okta, Azure AD, and Google plus granular RBAC. SCIM and multi-entity administration remain unestablished, so the roll-up is partial. Source |
| SCIM 2.0 provisioning | Not established | No current primary or marketplace source was found confirming SCIM provisioning. |
| Continuous control testing | Yes | The SOC 2 product page describes continuous SOC 2 Type II compliance, recurring evidence refresh, and testing of control design and operating effectiveness; it does not publish a test interval. Source |
| Native multi-framework support | Partial | Zania says teams map controls once and reuse them across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 42001. That establishes cross-framework mapping rather than separate native control sets. Source |
6 frameworks checked individually, and how well each is established.
A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.
| Framework | Evidence | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Vendor-claimed | Dedicated SOC 2 product page describes continuous evidence collection, control testing, remediation, reviewer visibility, and audit-ready reporting. Source |
| ISO 27001 | Vendor-claimed | Dedicated ISO 27001 product page describes continuous evidence collection, control testing, and remediation. Source |
| HIPAA | Vendor-claimed | Dedicated HIPAA product page describes evidence collection, safeguard testing, and remediation; public material does not establish whether Zania signs a BAA. Source |
| GDPR | Vendor-claimed | Dedicated GDPR product page describes evidence collection, evaluation of privacy controls and workflows, and remediation. Source |
| PCI DSS | Vendor-claimed | Dedicated PCI DSS product page describes evidence collection, security-control testing, and remediation; QSA or SAQ workflow depth is not publicly established. Source |
| ISO 42001 | Vendor-claimed | The pricing FAQ lists ISO 42001 among the frameworks included in the Enterprise plan. Source |
Zania uses quote-based pricing.
Getting a direct number requires a sales conversation. Anything below comes from reported quotes or marketplace listings, and is labeled as such.
- Disclosure model
- Quote-based
Software pricing alone does not establish the audit fee. A licensed CPA firm issues the SOC 2 report. A commercial offer may package coordination or the fee, so get the legal provider, deliverable, and amount in writing. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for scope and budget context.
Who actually issues the report.
No public material found indicates that Zania issues SOC 2 reports. Its Enterprise plan includes reviewer seats and audit-ready reporting, but no SOC 2 auditor marketplace or CPA network is publicly documented. Zania's Grant Thornton Advisory case study describes the platform being used for evidence analysis and controls testing in Nevada Gaming MICS engagements; that use does not establish Zania as the independent SOC 2 examiner.
Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.
Who Zania is for, and who it is not.
Good fit
An enterprise GRC team that wants one agentic platform for continuous SOC 2 evidence and controls testing alongside high-volume third-party risk assessments, with source-linked findings and human review.
Poor fit
A small company buying its first SOC 2 platform that needs self-serve onboarding, a published price, a documented native-integration catalog, and an established in-platform CPA marketplace.
Typical buyer: Enterprise security, risk, compliance, or internal-audit teams that need AI-assisted evidence analysis and controls testing across several frameworks, especially when third-party risk is also a major operating workload..
Compare Zania with three alternatives.
- Comp AI Sponsored
An engineering-led company that values an inspectable, self-hostable compliance platform and wants one vendor scope that can include guided implementation, a trust center, penetration testing, and audit coordination when quoted.
-
A growing SaaS company that wants deep, well-documented connectors on a mainstream stack, values interface polish and G2-rated support experience, and plans to run more than one framework over time.
-
Startups running one or two frameworks (e.g. SOC 2 plus HIPAA or ISO 27001) that want the fastest guided path to a first audit without per-user pricing or a large software bill.
Where every figure on this page came from.
9 sources, each with what it establishes and when we read it. If a claim here is out of date, this is the list that tells you which one to re-check.
- Names six supported frameworks and documents a mapped-control model that reuses work across them. https://zania.ai/compliance-automation
- Dedicated SOC 2 product page: continuous evidence collection, control design and operating-effectiveness testing, source-linked findings, remediation, reviewer visibility, and audit-ready reporting. https://zania.ai/compliance/soc2
- Quote-only Enterprise plan; pricing varies by vendor volume, assessment frequency, and program scope; includes all agents, reviewer seats, audit-ready reporting, and the named framework set. https://zania.ai/pricing/
- Inbound security-questionnaire workflow with generated draft responses, evidence mapping, documentation review, and human approval. https://zania.ai/security-questionnaire-automation/
- Documents SSO through SAML for Okta, Azure AD, and Google plus granular RBAC; does not document SCIM. https://zania.ai/security
- Autonomous third-party risk workflow spanning intake, assessment, evidence review, vendor follow-up, continuous monitoring, and triggered reassessments. https://zania.ai/third-party-risk-management
- Vendor case study describing Grant Thornton Advisory's use of Zania for evidence analysis and controls testing in Nevada Gaming MICS engagements. https://zania.ai/customers/elevating-the-standard-for-compliance-and-controls-testing-how-grant-thornton-uses-zania-to-deliver-more-accurate-in-depth-nevada-gaming-mics-audits
- Independent report that Zania was founded in 2023 and raised an $18 million NEA-led Series A, bringing total funding to $20 million. https://www.securityweek.com/zania-raises-18-million-for-ai-powered-grc-platform/
- G2 listed Zania at 5 out of 5 from one review and described it as an agentic AI platform for enterprise GRC. https://www.g2.com/sellers/zania
5 facts on this page we could not establish.
Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at Zania, send us the sources and we will fill them.
Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where Zania appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the ledger above alongside the date.