Menu
ComplyJet SOC 2 compliance software
ComplyJet is an unfunded, roughly 8-person company founded in 2024 (Tracxn, retrieved 2026-07-24), pitched as a flat-fee, per-company (not per-seat) alternative to platforms like Vanta and Drata.
By Peter Korpak, Lead Editor · independently researched · Methodology
- Pricing
- Published, $5K–$8K/yr
- Source-checked frameworks
- 8
- Integrations
- 350+
- G2 (2026-08-18)
- 4.8 · 17 reviews
Pricing tops out at $8,000/year for two frameworks on a 1-year term (a 3-year term drops the same tiers to $4,000/$6,400), but the audit itself is a separate line item paid to one of ComplyJet's partner CPA firms. Independent coverage is thin: G2 listed ComplyJet at 4.8/5 from 17 reviews as of 2026-08-18 (earlier cached snippets had conflicted on 4 vs 16); the one dated third-party review we could confirm, from the small directory soc2compliancetools.com, scored it 3.8/5 (last verified 2026-06-15) and is itself a niche content site rather than a major analyst source.
Unfunded as of July 2026, per Tracxn (profile last updated 2026-07-14): founded 2024 by Varun Jain (CEO) and Upendra Varma (CTO); the operating legal entity, Complyjet Private Limited, was incorporated in India in February 2025.
ComplyJet publishes a price.
You can read the numbers without a sales call, which is uncommon in this category and worth weighing on its own.
- Disclosure model
- Published, $5K–$8K/yr
- Sourced annual range
- USD 5,000–8,000 / year
- Basis
- Confirmed, 2026-07-24
Software pricing alone does not establish the audit fee. A licensed CPA firm issues the SOC 2 report. A commercial offer may package coordination or the fee, so get the legal provider, deliverable, and amount in writing. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for scope and budget context.
What ComplyJet does.
Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Yes | 350+ integrations pull evidence automatically per vendor product page; not independently benchmarked. Source |
| Auditor workspace | Yes | Vendor describes a 'dedicated, pre-populated workspace' the auditor accesses directly. Source |
| Trust center | Yes | Custom-branded trust center with access-request workflow, per vendor homepage. Source |
| Security questionnaire answering | Yes | Listed as a distinct product ('Questionnaire Automation - Answer security reviews in minutes'). Source |
| Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) | Not established | SSO, SCIM, and RBAC are not mentioned on any public ComplyJet product or pricing page found; not independently confirmed either way. |
| SCIM 2.0 provisioning | Not established | ComplyJet publishes an unusually granular tier comparison, more than fifteen line items, with no SSO or SCIM row at all. Suggestive absence, not a stated one. |
| Continuous control testing | Yes | Vendor states 'always-on checks across all five Trust Service Criteria, flagging issues before they become audit findings.' Source |
| Native multi-framework support | Partial | SOC 2 is the native build; vendor's own copy says ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR support works by mapping existing SOC 2 evidence to the new framework's requirements and closing gaps, i.e. a crosswalk off the SOC 2 control set. Source |
8 frameworks checked individually, and how well each is established.
A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.
| Framework | Evidence | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Vendor-claimed | Primary product line; vendor markets itself as 'the SOC 2 platform built for startups.' Source |
| ISO 27001 | Vendor-claimed | Vendor describes ISO 27001 support as largely crosswalk-mapped from SOC 2 controls, not a fully independent build. Source |
| HIPAA | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| GDPR | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| PCI DSS | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| NIST CSF | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| HITRUST | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| ISO 42001 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
Who actually issues the report.
ComplyJet does not itself issue the SOC 2 report. The platform automates evidence collection and hands the buyer off to one of a stated network of 40+ independent, accredited CPA audit firms that the customer selects; audit fees (vendor cites roughly $3,000-$12,000 depending on Type I/II and scope) are billed separately from the platform fee.
Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.
Who ComplyJet is for, and who it is not.
Good fit
A small SaaS startup that wants one flat-fee vendor to own evidence collection, policy setup, and hands-on audit coordination through a first SOC 2 (optionally plus one more framework) without hiring a compliance person.
Poor fit
Companies above roughly 50 employees, multi-entity or enterprise buyers that need confirmed SSO/SCIM/RBAC governance, or teams that already run a mature GRC program and just want a monitoring layer rather than hands-on guidance; ComplyJet does not publish enterprise-admin details and is a very small, recently founded, unfunded team (8 employees per Tracxn, May 2026).
Typical buyer: An early-stage B2B SaaS company (up to ~50 employees) pursuing its first SOC 2 report with no dedicated compliance or security hire..
Compare ComplyJet with three alternatives.
- Comp AI Sponsored
An engineering-led company that values an inspectable, self-hostable compliance platform and wants one vendor scope that can include guided implementation, a trust center, penetration testing, and audit coordination when quoted.
-
Published tiers leave room to add frameworks without a first sales call.
-
Published plans and bundled advisory support fit a budget-conscious buyer.
Where every figure on this page came from.
6 sources, each with what it establishes and when we read it. If a claim here is out of date, this is the list that tells you which one to re-check.
- Founded 2024 by Varun Jain and Upendra Varma, unfunded, 8 employees as of May 2026, legal entity incorporated in India Feb 2025. Profile last updated by Tracxn 2026-07-14. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/complyjet/__Y7I9L2ZVZeczAvVKZ46TzCQ3RxseYJqnKuq2Qt89gGY
- Independent directory review: 3.8/5, category 'startup-compliance', pricing from $4,000/year, 350+ integrations on every tier, 40+ pre-vetted auditors. Verdict last verified 2026-06-15. https://soc2compliancetools.com/solutions/complyjet
- G2 shows ComplyJet rated 4.8/5 from 17 reviews as of 2026-08-18. Earlier cached snippets had conflicted on 4 vs 16. https://www.g2.com/products/complyjet/reviews
- Company page states Founded 2024, HQ Lewes, Delaware, 11-50 employees (company-size band), 16,912 followers, Computer and Network Security industry. https://www.linkedin.com/company/complyjet
- Published pricing: Core $4,000-5,000/year (1 framework), Plus $6,400-8,000/year (2 frameworks), Custom (quote-only); all tiers include 350+ integrations. https://www.complyjet.com/pricing
- Product description of SOC 2 automation, audit workspace, continuous control monitoring, and how additional frameworks are crosswalk-mapped from SOC 2 controls. https://complyjet.com/frameworks/soc-2
2 facts on this page we could not establish.
Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at ComplyJet, send us the sources and we will fill them.
Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where ComplyJet appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the ledger above alongside the date.