Menu
01Thoropass
You want one audit-tracking workflow from evidence request to CPA report. Thoropass connects evidence requests, remediation, and the CPA examination. It also supports buyers that keep an existing GRC platform.
SOC 2 audit tracking platforms: Thoropass is our best fit.
Based on buyer feedback and our August 2026 platform evaluation, Thoropass is the best fit for buyers looking for SOC 2 audit tracking. It connects evidence requests, auditor questions, remediation, and the CPA examination, while also supporting teams that keep their existing GRC platform.
Platforms compared
10
Buyer-side tools
7
Auditor-side tools
3
Platform table
Which SOC 2 audit tracking platform is the best fit?
Thoropass is our best fit for buyers who want the audit workflow and CPA examination connected. Vanta remains a practical choice when the selected auditor already works in Vanta; the other platforms fit narrower workflow, framework, guidance, or budget requirements.
Capability data reflects 7 platform capability areas tracked on this page. Confirm exact feature access and auditor compatibility in the vendor proposal.
| Factor | Segment | Best for | Pricing | Capability notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoropass | Buyer-side | Best fit for audit tracking | Custom quote | Thoropass connects evidence requests, findings, remediation, and the CPA examination. Buyers can bundle the platform and audit or keep an existing GRC platform and engage Thoropass for the audit. |
| Vanta | Buyer-side | Teams whose auditor uses Vanta | Quote-based | 1,200+ automated tests run continuously. The auditor portal is in-platform — your auditor sees the same workspace you see, scoped to read-only. Most third-party SOC 2 auditors already have a Vanta login on file. |
| Drata | Buyer-side | Multi-framework programs (SOC 2 + ISO + HIPAA) | Quote-based | Spins up a separate audit workspace for the auditor with mapped evidence, control status, and a change log. Strong if you plan to run SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA on shared evidence. Auditor fees billed outside the platform. |
| Secureframe | Buyer-side | First-time SOC 2 with a hand-held workflow | Quote-based | Each account gets a dedicated compliance expert — often a former auditor — who runs the evidence-request triage with you. The workflow is more guided than Vanta or Drata; better fit if no one on your team has run an audit before. |
| Sprinto | Buyer-side | Fast first audit with a prescriptive plan | Sales-led | Tracks the audit as a fixed plan — not a flexible workspace. Good when you want to be told what to do next; less good when your auditor wants to deviate from the prescribed path. |
| Hyperproof | Buyer-side | GRC teams with multiple concurrent audits | Quote-based | Built around task assignment and progress dashboards across 140+ frameworks. Strong if you have a real GRC function tracking 3+ audits at once. Continuous monitoring is more documentation-led than API-led — fewer real-time drift alerts than Vanta or Drata. |
| Strike Graph | Buyer-side | Seed-stage startups on a hard budget | Free tier; paid from $9,000/yr | The only platform here that publishes pricing. Tracking is functional but lighter — the dashboard tells you what's missing; you do the chasing yourself. Add-ons can push the bill higher than the headline tier. |
| Audora | Auditor-side | When your auditor wants their own system | Auditor pays | Auditor-first workflow. Pulls evidence from your Vanta or Drata via Audora Connect, then runs the testing, sampling, and report-drafting on the auditor side. You see the request queue and respond — you don't see the auditor's working papers. Used by mid-size SOC 2 audit firms. |
| Optro (formerly AuditBoard) | Auditor-side | Internal audit teams at mid-market and up | Quote-based | Used inside the company by an internal audit function — not by the SOC 2 auditor. Board-level analytics across audits. Overkill below 500 employees; the right fit if you have a CAE and a published internal audit plan. |
| A-LIGN A-SCEND | Auditor-side | Teams using A-LIGN as their SOC 2 auditor | Client-scoped | A-LIGN clients only. AI-assisted audit management tied to A-LIGN's CPA practice. Tracks the audit on rails that A-LIGN built for itself — efficient if you're already a client, irrelevant otherwise. |
Selection method
How to choose tracking software
Start with the audit workflow. A polished dashboard will not help if your auditor cannot use it or your team still handles evidence in email.
02Vanta
Your auditor said: "We use Vanta — set us up." Auditor-portal access is in-platform. They get scoped read-only to your workspace. Anything else creates friction.
03Drata or Hyperproof
You'll run SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA on the same evidence. Both map controls across 25+ frameworks. Track one audit, ship three. Drata if you want API-led drift alerts; Hyperproof if you have a GRC team running multiple programs at once.
FAQ
Audit tracking platform questions
How to think about portals, dashboards, and renewal evidence.
What's the difference between SOC 2 audit tracking and SOC 2 compliance automation?
⌄
Compliance automation collects evidence continuously across your stack so you have something to show; audit tracking is the project-management layer on top — evidence requests, owner assignments, finding remediation, and progress through to sign-off. Most platforms in this list do both. A few (Audora, Optro) only do tracking.
Do I need a tracking platform, or can I run SOC 2 from a spreadsheet?
⌄
You can — for a Type 1 with under 50 controls. Above that, the issue isn't the spreadsheet, it's freshness: an auditor will reject screenshots dated three months ago, and a spreadsheet doesn't catch staleness. The tracking platform is what flags expired evidence before the auditor does.
My auditor wants to use their own system. Do I still need one of these?
⌄
Yes, but a different one. The auditor side (Audora, A-LIGN A-SCEND) handles their working papers; the buyer side (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe) handles your evidence and your team's task list. Audora Connect bridges the two so you don't double-collect evidence.
Can these platforms shorten the audit?
⌄
They shorten the prep and the back-and-forth — typically 6–8 weeks of evidence chasing collapses to 1–2 weeks. They cannot shorten the Type 2 observation window. Three months of operating evidence is still three months whether you track it in Vanta or in Notion.
Which platform do most SOC 2 auditors prefer?
⌄
Most specialist firms (A-LIGN, Prescient, Sensiba, Schellman, Insight Assurance) accept Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe natively — they have logins on file. Hyperproof and Thoropass are accepted but slower because the auditor is less likely to be fluent in the workspace. Ask your shortlist before signing.
How much does a SOC 2 audit tracking platform cost?
⌄
Public price: Strike Graph from $9,000/yr. Quote-based: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and Hyperproof typically $7,500–$50,000/yr depending on company size and framework count. Auditor-side tools (Audora, A-LIGN A-SCEND) are paid by the auditor and bundled into the audit fee. See our SOC 2 audit cost guide for the full breakdown.
Can I switch tracking platforms mid-audit?
⌄
Technically yes; in practice no. Evidence formats differ between platforms, and your auditor has already loaded artifacts into one system. Switch after your current report is issued, before the next observation window starts.
Next comparison
Related tools and directories
One call, not five
Need a platform-compatible auditor?
Tell us your current GRC stack and target report date. We route the scope to firms that can work with it.